football-tips


Contents
Home
Bookshop
Football
Newsletter
Other Sports
Tools
Horse Racing
Poker
Betting Theory
Asian Handicap
Best Sports to Bet On
Betting exchanges: an introduction
What is Value?
Shopping For the Best Prices
Staking Strategies
How Do I Know If I Have A Winning System?

Recent Forum Posts
Software to calculate Log Likelihood
- Can anybody recommend or direc...

player ratings
- was wondering if any of you ha...

Draw odds compiling, Football.
- Hello all, i'm new here and wa...

Shot On Target vs Expected Goals
- Having read Dixon and Robinson...

rating/h2h
- ratings+- h2h% 1 x...

sites
- wasnt sure where to put this s...

odds compiling
- ok using the spread sheet sum ...

Open Office Calc Problem
- My spreadsheets which have pro...

Weighting and Preference
- Lots of posting today :teeth_s...

Relative Importance
- I am trying to calculate the r...


Related Articles
Free Tipsters
Subscription Tipsters
Martingale System
Choosing a Sport to Bet on
Developing a Ratings System Part 1
Developing a Ratings System, Part 2
Interview with Zonker, Part 3
Fixed Profits or Fixed Stakes?
Interview with Zonker, Part 4
Bulletin from the exchanges frontline
Best of the Web: Betting Advice
Recording Betfair Prices for Dummies
Odds Or Evens?
Paradise Questionnaire - Jamdog
Hunter S Thomson review
Singles or doubles, part 2
Paradise questionnaire: Grasshopper
Compiling Soccer Odds for Dummies
Introduction to arbitrage betting
The Taxman Cometh
Odds compiling for Dummies, part 2
Developing a Ratings System, part 3
Greg Gordon's Betting Experiment part 2
Developing a Ratings System, part 4
Greg Gordon's Betting Experiment part 3
How To Make Money By Doing Nothing
The Paradise Questionnaire: Sailing Shoes
Ask The Doc: Monte Carlo simulations
Ask The Doc: Monte Carlo simulations part 2,
Debunking the Kelly Debunker
Kelly staking and Utility Functions

Short and Sweet

What is so unusual about this gambling sentence?

In betting, the odds shortened from 5/2 to 2/1

Click here for the answer


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Answer: When spoken out loud, it's the only way you can have 'two' or 'to' five times in a row and still make sense.

Back to top

  online-betting

How do I know if I have a winning system?

byDoctorOfDanger

Am I just on a lucky run or do I have a winning system?

Conversely, am I wasting my time on a particular system or is it just an unlucky run?

It is impossible to give a definitive answer to these questions, but what we can do is to use the science of statistics to estimate the probability that we have a winning (or losing if that is the question) system.

Most statisticians will, as a rule of thumb, look for 99% 'certainty' before they have a confidence in a system, so we will adopt that stance too. However, exactly the same priniciples apply for 95%, 99.9% or any other 'certainty level' that you desire to use.

Most statisticians will look for 99% 'certainty' before they have a confidence in a system

1) Estimate, or calculate the overround on the bets that you have made.

This will vary from sport to sport, and will strongly depend on how much shopping around you do for the best prices. To take an example - if you bet on the 1X2 market for English Premiership football, an individual bookie will typcially have an overround in the region of 11%. If you select from a range (e.g. 5 or 6) of bookies, you will normally bring this down to circa 5%. Lets assume for the rest of our example that the overround is 5%

2) Calculate the average odds at which you have bet.

Lets say 2.31 for our example

3) Multiply the odds above by the overround e.g. 2.31*1.05 (5% overround) to get the 'bookies fair odds'. In this case that gives us a value of 2.43

4) Invert the answer from (3) above to get the 'bookies true chance'

i.e. the probability of winning as estimated by the bookmaker. In this case 0.412, i.e. 41.2% chance. This is effectively the 'strike rate' that the bookie would expect you to have on the market.

5) Multiply the answer from (4) above by the number of bets made.

Lets say we have made 165 bets, we would get an answer of 165*0.412=68.03. This is the number of winning bets that the bookie would expect you to have, assuming you had guessed randomly (according to the odds offered). 68.03 winners from 165 bets, means that the balance, 96.97 bets, were losers.

6) Note the actual number of winning and losing bets that you had

lets say 75 and 90.

7) Use the 'Chitest' function in Excel to evaluate the following: CHITEST(A1:A2,B1:B2) where cells A1 & A2 contain the actual number of winning and losing bets (i.e. 75 and 90 respectively in our example), and cells B1 and B2 contain the estimated number of winners and losers, i.e. 68.03 and 96.97

"Be extra careful with back-testing as it is extremely easy to data-mine."

8) The answer returned in (7) above, i.e. 0.27, is the probability that the number of winners and losers you obtained is as a result of chance, i.e. just a lucky run. In other words there is a 27% chance that this is just a lucky run, and correspondingly, a 73% chance that you have a winning system.

As stated above, to be any way comfortable with the system (i.e. confident that it is truly a winning system), then 99% is the the 'confidence threshold' that you should be looking at. For 165 bets, 85 winners would be required to achieve this value.

Also, the above analysis assumes that the record above is as a result of live testing. Be extra careful with back-testing as it is extremely easy to (often subconcsiously) 'data-mine' so that you extract some 'rules' related to a lucky run, rather than to a winning system.

football-betting Got a question or comment about Winning Systems? Why not post it in our forum?

Related articles

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Miracles occur under Littlewood's Law
- expect a miracle every month
The infinite moneys theorem
- could they really do Shakespeare?
Classical definition of probability
- Probability of an event is the ratio . .
Markov Chain in betting theory
- used in modelling processes
Law of averages in betting theory
- used to express the view that. .
Sample Space in probability theory
- e.g. if the event is tossing a coin. .
The history of Playing Cards
- began in China after invention of. .
The Doomsday argument is a . .
- that claims to predict the future . .
The man who broke the bank at . .
- Joseph Jaggers (1830–1892) was . .
The gambler's fallacy in betting theory
- the first law of betting in many . .
Inverse gambler's fallacy
- is a tempting mistake in judgments

Read these books
The Art of Legging - The History Theory and Practice of Bookmaking on the English Turf
A Licence to Print Money - A journey Through the Gambling and Bookmaking World
The Theory of Gambling and Statistical Logic - Shortly after pithecanthropus erectus gained the ascendency, he turned his attention to the higher-order abstractions...
The Mathematics of Games and Gambling - Fascination with games of chance and speculation on the results of repeated random trials appear to be common to almost all societies, past and present...

Links
Guide to probability theory

Casino advice and strategies

Fundamental gambling formula

Ask Dr. Maths

UK casino reviews and tips

Gambling University

Great directory of sites

© Punters Paradise. Material may not be used without express permission.